Author Topic: a long story (Read 713 times)

david_8 · « **on:** October 20, 2004, 09:10:24 PM »

hi, all

i was researching p-pa

and came across this, would you vote for or against

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

penny · « **Reply #1 on:** October 20, 2004, 09:37:08 PM »

Very controversial, I have the degenerative arthritus they are talking about but I would still vote against it....Why? .....It is a deep seated belief that it is wrong to mess with nature (although much messing already goes on) and a fear of where things may lead I suppose....

Rocket · « **Reply #2 on:** October 20, 2004, 10:50:18 PM »

I would definitely vote for. I cannot accept the arguments against. Man has been messing with nature since the start of the human race, mostly to our advantage. Even the "natural" environment for most of us today is nothing like nature started with.

dippitmaggie · « **Reply #3 on:** October 21, 2004, 10:35:40 AM »

Medical and research ethics are there for a reason. Ther has to be general discussion and debate even if it is too ouir detriment

elaineG · « **Reply #4 on:** October 21, 2004, 10:47:42 AM »

I think i would vote "for". Mainly because of having a close friend who'se had two kidney transplants, and mostly because of having a brother whose had diabetes since he was 18 months old. Some times you have to push the boundaries a bit when it comes to medical research - i know full well that if two scientists many years ago hadnt been able to experiment on dogs, then my brother probably would be dead now. I would like to see it properly regulated though.